Technology investment survey (ERP, CRM and BI)

CPA Magazine’s 2015 technology investment survey shows readers are generally happy with their investments.

Making a business case for technology investments is challenging – and potentially career limiting. Anything you can learn from our peers’ experience in making these investments can be helpful in crafting a case.

That is why we decided to run our own IT satisfaction survey in CPA Magazine. It ran from January to April 2015, and is available at cpacanada.ca/mag-ITsurvey15.

QUESTIONS

The survey included a few questions about investments in enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM) and business intelligence (BI). We chose these products mainly because they are so widely used and because we have been conducting vendor surveys on them for many years. We also asked questions about industry, company size, system used, deployment (on premise or cloud), cost, satisfaction with implementation, satisfaction with benefits, and lessons learned. We used a satisfaction rating scale where 5=Very Satisfied, 4=Satisfied, 3=Neutral, 2=Unsatisfied, 1=Very Unsatisfied, and N/A).

RESULTS

First and foremost, we found that most organizations are generally satisfied with their implementations, as shown in the chart below. Functionality and reliability drew the highest rating with a 4point average weighting and reporting and support had the lowest with 3.33.

Satisfaction with implementation chart

The overall results are encouraging, because we usually hear mostly about failed implementations and not so much about the success stories. Systems have finally become easier to use and the vendors have learned — sometimes the hard way — how to implement them. Vendors want a long-term relationship with the customer because of the recurring maintenance or hosting fees. They also need to have their customers act as a reference to future prospects who often ask for at least two references before making a decision.

Many respondents also felt they had a positive ROI, but most were small businesses with smaller investments and faster payback. ROI is elusive for mid-market and large enterprises. But even with negative ROI, many organizations still make technology investments because a lot of the benefits that are critical to them are not tangible -- better decision-making or improved customer service, for example. See the chart below:

Satisfation with benefits chart

Although the reasons above are important, the biggest reason we have found for making a technology investment is that the organization thought they had no choice. This can happen because the system is no longer supported or the business has changed in terms of services or volume of business.

Some of the comments on lessons learned were also interesting. For example, respondents spoke of:

  • the value of spending time up front to fully understand the system and avoid extra costs during the implementation
  • the value of dedicated resources, and
  • the fact that newer systems are leaps and bounds ahead of legacy systems.

We have also learned some lessons from this survey. For example, we will try to make the survey shorter next time to encourage a better response rate. Please also send along your suggestions and feedback.

About the Author

Michael Burns


Michael Burns, MBA, CPA, CA, is president of 180 Systems (180systems.com), which provides independent consulting services, including business process review, system selection, business case development and project management.

comments powered by Disqus

Highlights

Update your knowledge and strengthen your network at this must-attend conference covering the most important issues and trends affecting audit committee members.

It’s probable that someone you know is deep in debt. If you are observant, you might see one of these seven signs.